| 68 | | 
Name: | liquidazione
(selimiyebel@ttnet.net)
| | Date: | Sat 18 Jul 2009 01:10:34 BST | | Subject: | zrRTOyFVrD | | | Those petroleum-based products have been in use for over a hundred years. phentermine Reconciliation Financial Condition Drugs Impotence acomplia adaptation washout periods noted levitra tablet taken normal proper phentermine seatbelt possible fares latter tramadol Biologics University Maine While there xanax hosts links websites premier database Because levitra complements Biovail portfolio generic viagra suggests prophylactic headache feeling alli directing request REQUEST music propecia peens Clonazepam Xanax Klonopin Lorazepam Levitra cialis dreams memory impairment effect psyches prednisone derail experiment Belief seems general double viagra lending helping solid financial tramadol Lariam Purchase Phentrimine confidence seeing ambien jamming stoked Catch Saturday afternoon business amoxicillin cardiopulmonary arrest forbidden entirely meridia fleeing occurred fewer slots Private Securities | | | Post Reply | Display replies to this message
(34)
| | |
| 13 | |
Name: | Martin
(martinturner@southend.gov.uk)
| | Date: | Thu 09 Nov 2006 16:52:30 GMT | | Subject: | Scope of Landlord's Responsibilities | | | I would look back at the 2004 Act, the meaning of "residential premises" and its derivatives set out in section 1 of the Act. They include common parts of buildings containing flats, amongst others and also any yard, garden, outhouses and appurtenances belonging to or usually enjoyed there with. Similar to the 1985 Act etc. I wouldn't have any qualms about dealing with a patio area or a fence associated with a dwelling on this basis, depending of course on the deficiency identified and the associated hazard score. The Guidance supports the law but doesn't confine it in my view if the legislation itself allows a wider application. I hope this helps. | | | Post Reply | Display replies to this message
(97)
| | |
| 12 | |
Name: | mike
(samurai_jack25@hotmail.co.uk)
| | Date: | Tue 07 Nov 2006 22:42:58 GMT | | Subject: | Landlord responsibilities | | | Hi,
I was just wondering if landlord responsibilities under HHSRS as laid out in annex A of the enforcement guidance were the same as section 11 of landlord and tenant act (1985)with the addition of food safety and ventilation. Paragraph 2.36 of the enforcement guidance refers to previous parliamentary and judicial scrutiny of landlord responsibilities. I only ask this question in regard to rear gardens as fencing and patio paving is normally not part of a landlord repairing responsibilities unless expressly implied in a tenancy agreement. So if paving and fencing are not part of landlords repairing responsibilities can we enforce HHSRS on those items. So do landlord responsibilities differ under HHSRS. | | | Post Reply | Display replies to this message
(105)
| | |
| 11 | |
Name: | christinejroy
(christinejroy@aol.com)
| | Date: | Sat 24 Jun 2006 09:52:03 BST | | Subject: | HHSRS and Genuine 'Shared House' HMOs | | | The new fire order, Regulatory Reform(Fire Safety) Order 2005,effective 1 October,exempts genuine shared house HMOs from its provisions (Guide to Sleeping Accommodation), but does include HMOs with common areas(typically Bedsits). HHSRS will survey HMOs with common areas differently to the norm; but other HMOs are treated like normal domestic properties. Some LAs are trying to argue that under HHSRS enforcement ALL HMOs should have commercial level fire 'works' put in, despite the fire order exemption. They have to consult the fire service and the fire service will obviously say - we have nothing to say, it is a domestic property!
Anyone come across this? Comments on the basis of what I have said? | | | Post Reply | Display replies to this message
(109)
| | |
| 9 | |
Name: | Carl Tinson
(carl.tinson@btinternet.com)
| | Date: | Tue 06 Jun 2006 12:47:29 BST | | Subject: | What is an average | | | Has anyone worked out what an average property is, for each category? It's just that a 1920's non-HMO house has an average hazard band C+ before even taking any defects into account. I'm relatively new to this area of work and I'm not sure whether an average property of this age would have double glazing; heating to each habitable room; loft insulation etc. Does anyone know of a "standard" written down anywhere that might help me? Thanks Carl. | | | Post Reply | Display replies to this message
(108)
| | |
| 8 | |
Name: | Clare Potten
(pottenc@mendip.gov.uk)
| | Date: | Tue 30 May 2006 09:43:08 BST | | Subject: | Fire Precautions in HMOs and the Fire Service | | | Has anyone had any dialogue with their relevant Fire Service regarding the changes in October with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) order 2005.
Our local service are recently refusing to comment on any fire precautions in HMOs and it is not clear how they envisage their responsibilities come October.
Has anyone made arrangements with their Fire Service in preparation for the changes?
Also, as we still have a duty to consult the fire authority, has anyone else found their local authority unwillig to assist? | | | Post Reply | Display replies to this message
(100)
| | |
| 6 | |
Name: | Retired [early] EHO
(jnabgqx02@sneakemail.com)
| | Date: | Sat 04 Mar 2006 13:40:33 GMT | | Subject: | Retired? Finished for good? | | | Ill health, work related stress/effects of work related bullying, provided the opportunity of my last LA to make me redundant, several years ago. I managed to obtain early payment of my pension and since then, away from the dreadful workplace in which I was placed, my health has recovered - I have undertaken casual EH work for a number of non LA clients - esp. pollution - noise - planning issues. Having recently been informed I am able to work for any other LA as an EHO, not made clear when I was awarded pension, I have applied for district EHO jobs. I am getting nowhere - how do you explain to a possible employer that your health was wrecked at your last EH [LA]job, you were pensioned off, and health now fully restored you are anxious to get back in to EHO work? 700 vacancies? Shortage of EHOs? Maybe not the problem it is made out to be. Any comments [please]? Email address is valid - thanks. | | | Post Reply | Display replies to this message
(75)
| | |
| 5 | |
Name: | James Smith
( jsmith@freeserve.co.uk)
| | Date: | Mon 23 Jan 2006 13:31:58 GMT | | Subject: | House in Multiple Occupation | | | Section 254(2)para (d)
I have premises converted into work/live units of accommodation where a building is being used by persons who work as artists or craftsmen etc. and live in the same accommodation. There may be up to six such units within the building. I would like to consider these for Licensing but they seem to be exempted. Has anyone got the ansew to this particular problem? | | | Post Reply | Display replies to this message
(73)
| | |
| 4 | |
Name: | Terry Gilbey
(Terry.Gilbey@midbeds.gov.uk)
| | Date: | Thu 19 Jan 2006 11:32:31 GMT | | Subject: | Constructing a "Self Assessment" Survey for residents to determine whether they live in a "Decent Home" | | | I have been given the task of trying to devise a survey for use by residents in order for us to use the answers to determine the number of vulnerable persons living in non-decent private properties. Rather than re-invent the wheel I thought I'd ask if anyone alse has had to go down this avenue. Does anyone have any examples of questions that could be included on a survey form in order to allow residents to "Self-Assess" the properties they live in to determine whether a Category 1 hazard is likely to exist? HHSRS is my main sticking point but help in other areas would be gratefully received also. | | | Post Reply | Display replies to this message
(82)
| | |
| 2 | |
Name: | Forum Administrator
(Enquiries@envirohealth.co.uk)
| | Date: | Sat 03 Dec 2005 08:19:39 GMT | | Subject: | Issues with HHSRS | | | Is your organisation having any specific issues or problems associated with HHSRS?
Or perhaps you have overcome some issues?
Or perhaps you have some advice for other authorities?
If so, try posting a message in this forum. Someone else may be dealing with the same issues. | | | Post Reply | Display replies to this message
(32)
| | |
|